Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 30247 for de.
Search results 25231 - 25240 of 30247 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 13, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the criminal charge is a legal determination which we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 125, ¶7, 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27397 - 2006-12-14
the criminal charge is a legal determination which we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2004 WI App 125, ¶7, 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27397 - 2006-12-14
Robert Christman v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.
. Whether a particular defense is available against a claim is generally a question of law to be reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12820 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a particular defense is available against a claim is generally a question of law to be reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12820 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard T. Collins
. Stat. §§ 939.62 and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 939.62 and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Napper
review is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Munoz, 200 Wis.2d 391, 395, 546 N.W.2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
review is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Munoz, 200 Wis.2d 391, 395, 546 N.W.2d 570
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
State v. Elbert Whitelaw
. Whether counsel's performance is prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel's performance is prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8630 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court. Krier, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134585 - 2015-02-09
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the circuit court. Krier, 317 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134585 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to de novo review. Town of Stiles, 327 Wis. 2d 491, ¶10. In general, a court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97878 - 2013-06-05
to de novo review. Town of Stiles, 327 Wis. 2d 491, ¶10. In general, a court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97878 - 2013-06-05
Sylvia A. Shovers v. Gary D. Shovers
a summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
a summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24778 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
WI APP 210
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). ¶10 The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis. 2d 1, 8, 546 N.W.2d 151 (1996). ¶10 The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31