Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 57358 for id.
Search results 25251 - 25260 of 57358 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
of the Strickland test had not been met. See id. at 697. The court’s reasoning for the decision is unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
State v. Timothy J. Powers
law. See id. at ¶2. We concluded in Thorstad that, so long as the four requirements outlined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15578 - 2005-03-31
law. See id. at ¶2. We concluded in Thorstad that, so long as the four requirements outlined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alfonso Arias-Cruz
of the sentence. See id. at 546. This determination is committed to the circuit court’s discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4452 - 2017-09-19
of the sentence. See id. at 546. This determination is committed to the circuit court’s discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4452 - 2017-09-19
State v. William James, Jr.
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8472 - 2005-03-31
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his or her right to counsel.” Id., ¶25. If the defendant makes a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his or her right to counsel.” Id., ¶25. If the defendant makes a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35761 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrell Cage
of fairness. Id. When the partiality of an individual juror is placed at issue, the question is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
of fairness. Id. When the partiality of an individual juror is placed at issue, the question is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 418, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). We presume the trial court acted reasonably. Id. As long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49040 - 2014-09-15
, 418, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998). We presume the trial court acted reasonably. Id. As long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Diane K. Butz
, the trial court is not to weigh the competing evidence when determining probable cause. Id. at 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4108 - 2017-09-20
, the trial court is not to weigh the competing evidence when determining probable cause. Id. at 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4108 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the parties.” Id. at 8 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
of the parties.” Id. at 8 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). Once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. However, we 2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990071 - 2025-07-29
.” Id. However, we 2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990071 - 2025-07-29