Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25291 - 25300 of 30059 for de.
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6233 - 2005-03-31
our review de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6233 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Our review of an alleged discovery violation presents questions of law, each of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74024 - 2011-11-21
Our review of an alleged discovery violation presents questions of law, each of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74024 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
State v. Murle E. Perkins
which we review de novo. See id. ¶24 In analyzing an ineffective assistance claim, this court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15777 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. See id. ¶24 In analyzing an ineffective assistance claim, this court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
N.W.2d 620 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2019-20)). “We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=520081 - 2022-05-12
State v. Larry D. Benoit
the objection. The error, if any, was de minimis and therefore harmless. State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7853 - 2005-03-31
the objection. The error, if any, was de minimis and therefore harmless. State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7853 - 2005-03-31
Russell Allen v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
of Lawrence & Des Rochers of St. Nazianz. 2005 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6955 - 2005-03-31
of Lawrence & Des Rochers of St. Nazianz. 2005 WI App 40 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James F.R., Jr.
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Koput, 142 Wis.2d 370, 378, 418 N.W.2d 804, 808 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Koput, 142 Wis.2d 370, 378, 418 N.W.2d 804, 808 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d at 547. ¶23 As previously noted, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241909 - 2019-06-11
of law that we review de novo. See Hegwood, 113 Wis. 2d at 547. ¶23 As previously noted, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241909 - 2019-06-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary Judgment ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52432 - 2014-09-15
STANDARD OF REVIEW Summary Judgment ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52432 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the pleadings is de novo. Here, we have independently concluded, as a matter of law, that Coltman’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147292 - 2017-09-21
on the pleadings is de novo. Here, we have independently concluded, as a matter of law, that Coltman’s complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147292 - 2017-09-21