Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2531 - 2540 of 6640 for mix.

Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
. at 697. ¶14 In a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, we are presented with a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at 311-12. The standard of review is a mixed question of law and fact. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259310 - 2020-05-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶11 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joanne Sekula
and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of fact and law, the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3712 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James Ward
of counsel claims present mixed questions of law and fact. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 633–634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12371 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Maurice S. Ewing
). Additionally, our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim presents a mixed question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19333 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dorian V. Neal
. Oswald, 2000 WI App 2, ¶49, 232 Wis. 2d 62, 606 N.W.2d 207. Whether counsel was ineffective is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Lang
a mixed question of fact and law. See id. at 720, 596 N.W.2d at 779. A circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15510 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
expressing pure opinion and communicates a “mixed opinion,” that is, a statement that blends an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109231 - 2014-03-19

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
of performance and prejudice present mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5146 - 2005-03-31