Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 84377 for case number.
Search results 25301 - 25310 of 84377 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
2003 WI App 12 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1076-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 12 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1076-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark Sevelin
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0729‑CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0729‑CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10531 - 2005-03-31
State v. Max W. Ohlmann
number one at “a pre-determined location in the Marathon County vicinity” when in fact Glaman had met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
number one at “a pre-determined location in the Marathon County vicinity” when in fact Glaman had met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26366 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
to a representative of the Department of Justice regarding a case unrelated to Keizer’s. In the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10
to a representative of the Department of Justice regarding a case unrelated to Keizer’s. In the letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145725 - 2015-08-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041931 - 2025-11-25
Frontsheet
2010 WI 118 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP3177-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55194 - 2010-10-05
2010 WI 118 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP3177-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55194 - 2010-10-05
[PDF]
Orville H. Werner v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
because it could only speculate concerning the cause of his condition. In this case, Cameron testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8333 - 2017-09-19
because it could only speculate concerning the cause of his condition. In this case, Cameron testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8333 - 2017-09-19
Dean P. Laing v. Adams County Planning and Zoning Department
purpose. Cities Serv., 21 Wis.2d at 544, 124 N.W.2d at 823. In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8659 - 2005-03-31
purpose. Cities Serv., 21 Wis.2d at 544, 124 N.W.2d at 823. In the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
admitted that Bates and the victim had argued over a number of things including the victim wanting Foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15
admitted that Bates and the victim had argued over a number of things including the victim wanting Foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43576 - 2014-09-15