Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25311 - 25320 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
. In that case, Smejkal took his then fiancée’s vehicle to Milwaukee without her permission. The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
. In that case, Smejkal took his then fiancée’s vehicle to Milwaukee without her permission. The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Pasko v. City of Milwaukee
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2135 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12785 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2135 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12785 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
service of process mandated dismissal of the present case. In the previous action, a motion to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370396 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In these consolidated cases, Matthew R. Fett appeals from judgments of conviction entered upon his guilty pleas to (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145255 - 2017-09-21
. In these consolidated cases, Matthew R. Fett appeals from judgments of conviction entered upon his guilty pleas to (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145255 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David R. Nott
2003 WI 17 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-2001-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16653 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI 17 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-2001-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16653 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
precedence over other cases in the circuit court. Following a de novo trial, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keith A. Johnson
in both cases on June 4, 1998, and was continued on July 15, 1998. The only witness to testify on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2005-03-31
in both cases on June 4, 1998, and was continued on July 15, 1998. The only witness to testify on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14696 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
describe the two objections. ¶5 The State’s case was based on the testimony of the victim, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481404 - 2022-02-10
describe the two objections. ¶5 The State’s case was based on the testimony of the victim, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481404 - 2022-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the case. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 These consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104347 - 2017-09-21
from the case. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 These consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104347 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Karla J.
or services (CHIPS), see § 48.415(2). ¶3 The case proceeded to trial. The State called Karla adversely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20645 - 2017-09-21
or services (CHIPS), see § 48.415(2). ¶3 The case proceeded to trial. The State called Karla adversely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20645 - 2017-09-21