Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 25411 - 25420 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, we independently review the record to determine whether the facts provide support for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
, we independently review the record to determine whether the facts provide support for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 635 N.W.2d 797. As such, this court’s review is “limited to the record” and addresses only whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099420 - 2026-04-02
, 635 N.W.2d 797. As such, this court’s review is “limited to the record” and addresses only whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099420 - 2026-04-02
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Davis
convicted of three felonies is erroneous. The record reveals that the jury was advised that Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
convicted of three felonies is erroneous. The record reveals that the jury was advised that Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
Holliman testified to. Given the record, even if an investigation would have uncovered other “attempts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
Holliman testified to. Given the record, even if an investigation would have uncovered other “attempts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733555 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
Scott Rubadeau v. David H. Schwarz
, is in the record. The second alleged violation states that “[o]n or about 3-19-01 the aforesaid did have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
, is in the record. The second alleged violation states that “[o]n or about 3-19-01 the aforesaid did have access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Yelk
review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any further proceedings would lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and appellate counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232742 - 2019-01-11
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and appellate counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232742 - 2019-01-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine where the best interests of the child lie, the record should reflect adequate consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257443 - 2020-04-13
to determine where the best interests of the child lie, the record should reflect adequate consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257443 - 2020-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information and agreed to discuss the matter in the morning. Nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240150 - 2019-05-09
information and agreed to discuss the matter in the morning. Nothing in the record indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240150 - 2019-05-09