Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 36157 for affidavit of mailing.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Pro Hac Vice Motion - Adame
11/14/23, 11:34 AM Public Rights Project Mail - Receipt for Transaction Number: 2469849 https
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1120adame.pdf - 2023-11-21

Sean Simpson v. Camelot Music
of the rescheduling either by mail or personal service.[1] When Simpson failed to appear at the pretrial conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13323 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
or by mailing it to the last-known address.” The record shows that notice—with Kedinger on the distribution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58204 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kate A. Christnot
the certified mail receipt personally, but she failed to respond to the OLR's requests for information about
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16825 - 2017-09-21

Stephen J. Weissenberger v. Robert Kellberg
in the Wisconsin Resource Center, mailed an open records request to the sheriff's department. In his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13968 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 801.14(2) provides that “[s]ervice … upon a party shall be made by delivering a copy or by mailing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58204 - 2010-12-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
electronic mail stating that Munzinger was appealing the judgment; also attached to the email were copies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244074 - 2019-07-23

Mark C. Laska v. Mary Jane Laska
and Katherine’s attorney faxed and mailed a similar memorandum of agreement to Mary Jane’s attorney. On May 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4790 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kate A. Christnot
of the grievance from the OLR, because she signed the certified mail receipt personally, but she failed to respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16825 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
officials for mailing prior to expiration of the ninety-day time frame, his appeal might be timely. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49478 - 2014-09-15