Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 2551 - 2560 of 83351 for simple case search/1000.
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=429&year=2012
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=429&year=2012
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
2003 WI 121 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 00-2590-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16422 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 121 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 00-2590-CR COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16422 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew J. Knapp
the second search, and granted the motion to suppress Knapp's statements during the State's case-in-chief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16422 - 2005-03-31
the second search, and granted the motion to suppress Knapp's statements during the State's case-in-chief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16422 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP1196-CR 3 surcharge in 2001 on a felony drug case. All of Howard’s requests were denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP1196-CR 3 surcharge in 2001 on a felony drug case. All of Howard’s requests were denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case that the Baileys’ property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140364 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82115 - 2014-09-15
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82115 - 2014-09-15
Mercy Medical Center of Oshkosh v. Albert Fisher
a prima facie case and that Fisher’s affidavit in opposition failed to meet the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2940 - 2005-03-31
a prima facie case and that Fisher’s affidavit in opposition failed to meet the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2940 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by granting summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140364 - 2015-04-22
erred by granting summary judgment because the Department “failed to make a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140364 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
. § 756.096(3)(am) [1995-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21
. § 756.096(3)(am) [1995-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15280 - 2017-09-21