Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25501 - 25510 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2015
under SCR 20:8.4(c), that his other ethical violations were de minimis, that restitution
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139855 - 2017-09-21
under SCR 20:8.4(c), that his other ethical violations were de minimis, that restitution
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2009
Construction, Inc. purchased properties in Green Bay and De Pere for development. In order to buy those
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42536 - 2014-09-15
Construction, Inc. purchased properties in Green Bay and De Pere for development. In order to buy those
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2016
and at $4,169,000 in 2013. Regency West filed a de novo refund action in the circuit court after the city denied
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174462 - 2017-09-21
and at $4,169,000 in 2013. Regency West filed a de novo refund action in the circuit court after the city denied
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174462 - 2017-09-21
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
Wis. 2d 306, 310, 334 N.W.2d 883 (1983). As such, it is subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 306, 310, 334 N.W.2d 883 (1983). As such, it is subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6484 - 2005-03-31
John L. Senty v. James A. Senty
Judgment ¶21 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24628 - 2006-03-27
Judgment ¶21 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24628 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
The validity of a waiver is a question of law that we review de novo, see Ward, 318 Wis. 2d 301, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564329 - 2022-09-09
[PDF]
Sheboygan County Department of Health and Human Services v. Jodell G.
). Construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See J.W.T. v. State, 159 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2706 - 2017-09-19
). Construction of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See J.W.T. v. State, 159 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2706 - 2017-09-19
Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. Gary P. Fleming
of law which we review de novo. Waage v. Borer, 188 Wis.2d 324, 328, 525 N.W.2d 96, 98 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
of law which we review de novo. Waage v. Borer, 188 Wis.2d 324, 328, 525 N.W.2d 96, 98 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113970 - 2017-09-21
conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113970 - 2017-09-21
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31