Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2561 - 2570 of 76627 for judgment for u s.
Search results 2561 - 2570 of 76627 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: dennis r. cimpl, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: dennis r. cimpl, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60276 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
, Judge Mark S. Gempeler. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20196 - 2017-09-21
, Judge Mark S. Gempeler. Reversed and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 13
. § 973.15(8)(a)1, which allows circuit courts to stay a sentence for “legal cause” or “[u]nder s. 973.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617230 - 2023-04-06
. § 973.15(8)(a)1, which allows circuit courts to stay a sentence for “legal cause” or “[u]nder s. 973.09(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617230 - 2023-04-06
State v. Serena M.T.
Prejudicial Device?, 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases). In this case, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13815 - 2005-03-31
Prejudicial Device?, 27 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases). In this case, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Sean R. Haverty
of a Green Lake county resident. It made a U-turn in the driveway and then parked on the edge of the lawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
of a Green Lake county resident. It made a U-turn in the driveway and then parked on the edge of the lawn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, “[u]p against that we have no atrociously bad driving, and we have no slurred speech or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123251 - 2014-10-07
, “[u]p against that we have no atrociously bad driving, and we have no slurred speech or other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123251 - 2014-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Serena M.T.
Tool or Unfairly Prejudicial Device?, 27 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13815 - 2014-09-15
Tool or Unfairly Prejudicial Device?, 27 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 789, 790 n.10 (1993) (collecting cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13815 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. The court found that while the officer saw “questionable driving” and glassy eyes, “[u]p
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123251 - 2017-09-21
sobriety tests. The court found that while the officer saw “questionable driving” and glassy eyes, “[u]p
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123251 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
) driving “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance, a controlled substance analog
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28