Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 83807 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 25761 - 25770 of 83807 for simple case search/1000.
Donn Wendorff v. Andrew A. Oechsner
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did and therefore reverse.[1] ¶2 Donn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5295 - 2005-03-31
in dismissing the case. We conclude that it did and therefore reverse.[1] ¶2 Donn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5295 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Robert E. Ryan
that “[d]ue to the late request here, the case will remain on for trial.” Then, at a second status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14915 - 2005-03-31
that “[d]ue to the late request here, the case will remain on for trial.” Then, at a second status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14915 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18
The Warehouse II, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
private property for the purpose of building public highways. Wis. Stat. § 32.05. In this case, the DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6995 - 2005-03-31
private property for the purpose of building public highways. Wis. Stat. § 32.05. In this case, the DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2011
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER, 2011 The cases listed below
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70483 - 2014-09-15
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER, 2011 The cases listed below
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 31
PER CURIAM. This case is before the court following referee David A. Piehler’s report recommending
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
PER CURIAM. This case is before the court following referee David A. Piehler’s report recommending
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977961 - 2025-07-01
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10092 - 2005-03-31
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31
22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could not limit shelter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
impermissible “Catch 22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
impermissible “Catch 22” situation. In that case, the court held that a general relief program could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11883 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 51
2021 WI App 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403023 - 2021-09-08
2021 WI App 51 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=403023 - 2021-09-08