Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25791 - 25800 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25791 - 25800 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case was originally resolved by an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26243 - 2006-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
a decision in the criminal case. Therefore, rather than filing his “clarification” motion in the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32530 - 2008-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
a no-merit report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel in each of these consolidated cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986619 - 2025-07-22
State v. Lisa M. Berger
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the Wis. Stat. § 345.421 motion as untimely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2865 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. In Brown County case No. 2013CF1036, the complaint charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01
conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. In Brown County case No. 2013CF1036, the complaint charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142723 - 2015-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209383 - 2018-03-07
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209383 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
State v. Lisa M. Berger
The central issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the WIS. STAT. § 345.421 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
The central issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the WIS. STAT. § 345.421 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2865 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wilbur Daye v. Mark A. Bebel
. ¶2 The appellants commenced this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26243 - 2017-09-21
. ¶2 The appellants commenced this action for a prescriptive easement and other relief. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-05-09
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3275 - 2005-05-09
State v. Frank J. Sackatook, Jr.
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-05-09
that the prosecutor would have to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt and “if we had a jury deciding the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3274 - 2005-05-09