Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25811 - 25820 of 29817 for des.
Search results 25811 - 25820 of 29817 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
.”). We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71741 - 2011-10-03
.”). We review de novo whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. Kerkvliet v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71741 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are to be reviewed “under the same standard we apply to a [trial] court’s conclusions of law—de novo.” Id., ¶84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218405 - 2018-09-05
are to be reviewed “under the same standard we apply to a [trial] court’s conclusions of law—de novo.” Id., ¶84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218405 - 2018-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court. Frost v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
WI APP 4
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de novo.3 Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reasonable suspicion—is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456, 685 N.W.2d 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226507 - 2018-11-07
, reasonable suspicion—is de novo. State v. Powers, 2004 WI App 143, ¶6, 275 Wis. 2d 456, 685 N.W.2d 869
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226507 - 2018-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on January 20, 2024. Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15
on January 20, 2024. Mootness is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Marathon Cnty. v. D.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
WI 12
to disqualify a justice of this court from participation in pending cases have become motions de jour
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44040 - 2014-09-15
to disqualify a justice of this court from participation in pending cases have become motions de jour
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
conclusions of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16779 - 2017-09-21
conclusions of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16779 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brian Read v. Donald Read
is an appropriate shareholder to maintain a derivative action under Wisconsin law. Read suggests the test is a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9632 - 2017-09-19
is an appropriate shareholder to maintain a derivative action under Wisconsin law. Read suggests the test is a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9632 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Tully
(1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18841 - 2017-09-21
(1997). Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18841 - 2017-09-21