Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 30059 for de.
WI App 163 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP109 Complete Title of...
. The interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74298 - 2011-12-13
. The interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74298 - 2011-12-13
[PDF]
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶15 If a court finds that one prong of the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795210 - 2024-05-01
2007 WI App 206
(but not LaVerne’s) and refused to modify the child support. James brought a de novo motion in front of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
(but not LaVerne’s) and refused to modify the child support. James brought a de novo motion in front of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8414 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8414 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Catherine M. Doyle v. Ward Engelke
are questions of law which we review de novo. See Just v. Land Reclamation, Ltd., 155 Wis. 2d 737, 744, 456
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17098 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law which we review de novo. See Just v. Land Reclamation, Ltd., 155 Wis. 2d 737, 744, 456
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17098 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117, 310 N.W.2d 789 (1981
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117, 310 N.W.2d 789 (1981
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20923 - 2017-09-21
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20923 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the deferential standard of review. Third, even if we applied a de novo standard of review, Hansen’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78727 - 2014-09-15
the deferential standard of review. Third, even if we applied a de novo standard of review, Hansen’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78727 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Broome v. DOC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171158 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Broome v. DOC, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06