Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25831 - 25840 of 29810 for des.
Search results 25831 - 25840 of 29810 for des.
Frontsheet
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
Daniel Khalar v. James Murphy
for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. See Voss v. City of Middleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. See Voss v. City of Middleton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 2
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of a stop or detention meet constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32210 - 2008-03-25
the circumstances of a stop or detention meet constitutional standards is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32210 - 2008-03-25
ANR Pipeline Company v.
can be granted are matters of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9942 - 2005-03-31
can be granted are matters of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9942 - 2005-03-31
Raul J. Walters v. National Properties, LLC
to the terms of a commercial lease, and determine the parties' rights under that lease, we exercise de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18699 - 2005-06-22
to the terms of a commercial lease, and determine the parties' rights under that lease, we exercise de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18699 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
Adam P. Read v. Susan Riseling
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11561 - 2017-09-19
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11561 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo using well-settled legal principles. See State v. Gramza, 2020 WI App 81, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872113 - 2024-11-05
that we review de novo using well-settled legal principles. See State v. Gramza, 2020 WI App 81, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872113 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
WI APP 122
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial court applied the incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial court applied the incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15