Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 30059 for de.

2009 WI APP 63
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] State v. Latosha Armstead
this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Roger S. Walker
interpretation presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Tucker, 2005 WI 46, ¶11, 279 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25753 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
standard is a question of law subject to de novo review.”). We conclude that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 65
are questions of law that we review de novo. Martel, 262 Wis. 2d 483, ¶8. “[S]tatutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868937 - 2024-12-18

Darci K. Danner v. Auto-Owners Insurance
is a question of law we review de novo. See Logterman v. Dawson, 190 Wis. 2d 90, 101, 526 N.W.2d 768 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15413 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
, 116 Wis. 2d 380, 382, 342 N.W.2d 406 (1984). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133825 - 2015-01-27

State v. Mark T. Smith
of his right to present a defense is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Id., ¶69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
; however, we review the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286140 - 2020-09-10

COURT OF APPEALS
of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89797 - 2012-12-03