Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 82690 for case code.

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court Open Rules Petition Conference
to Judicial Code Review Committee. Rule Petition 12-11: Petition to create a Judicial Code Review Committee
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac101315.pdf - 2015-10-02

Tony G. Merriweather v. Gary R. McCaughtry
review by the warden and DOC administrator under Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 308.04(9). In that review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14063 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tony G. Merriweather v. Gary R. McCaughtry
to administrative review by the warden and DOC administrator under WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 308.04(9). In that review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14063 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
-0011-FT 2 The following case history is undisputed. On July 6, 1994, Hosale submitted plans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11907 - 2017-09-21

City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
of summary judgment to the City was proper and affirm. The following case history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2009-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
has already been sent, in which case the hearing shall proceed. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, WIS., CODE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70009 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the license in the event any objections to renewal are found to be true.” City of Milwaukee, Wis., Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70009 - 2011-08-17

Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
, contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § TRANS 327.03(5). Sylvia’s contends that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4871 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
, contrary to Wis. Admin. Code § TRANS 327.03(5). Sylvia’s contends that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4872 - 2005-03-31

Arlandis Issac v. Gerald A. Berge
of the return. However, the court needs factual information to decide that motion. In this case, the officer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19753 - 2005-09-28