Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 24556 for extending.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
in that case the time limits were extended based on a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to entry
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1038740 - 2025-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Macemon to five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision on Count 1—the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
Macemon to five years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision on Count 1—the maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
jurisdiction over them, and the time to do so could not be extended. Gonzalez moved for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347318 - 2021-03-18
jurisdiction over them, and the time to do so could not be extended. Gonzalez moved for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347318 - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
John E. Isom v. Jeffrey Endicott
of extended supervision. 3 Isom did not appeal. ¶3 On March 21, 2003, Isom moved pro se for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
of extended supervision. 3 Isom did not appeal. ¶3 On March 21, 2003, Isom moved pro se for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26297 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on July 5, 2017. The amended judgment of conviction corrected an error relating to the term of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218890 - 2018-09-12
on July 5, 2017. The amended judgment of conviction corrected an error relating to the term of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218890 - 2018-09-12
CA Blank Order
the public. The court then sentenced Holloway to ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
the public. The court then sentenced Holloway to ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144213 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court sentenced Mason to 18 years of initial confinement and 7 years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
. The court sentenced Mason to 18 years of initial confinement and 7 years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment on the first count, with five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
of imprisonment on the first count, with five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109906 - 2014-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Andrew Hinkel, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226871 - 2018-11-07
years of extended supervision. He appeals. Appellate counsel, Attorney Andrew Hinkel, filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226871 - 2018-11-07