Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25961 - 25970 of 29739 for des.

[PDF] WI APP 114
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38624 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 2
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
is resolved by whether a defendants’ actions are legally required, then de novo review is appropriate.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10456 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
coverage. DISCUSSION I. Standard of Review ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62145 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo, though the statute is construed broadly in favor of initial joinder. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20

WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2112 Complete Title of...
an opportunity to secure de novo review of the DNR’s WPDES permitting decisions … and to further develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111239 - 2014-05-27

State v. Michael A. Sveum
on the definition of “accompanied.” This presents a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12804 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 33
as if our review is de novo, relying on the same reasons it gave for its argument that Edmunds’s current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31696 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we apply the same standard as the circuit court and our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31069 - 2008-01-29

COURT OF APPEALS
on a lesser-included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36035 - 2009-03-30