Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26011 - 26020 of 29722 for des.
Search results 26011 - 26020 of 29722 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court correctly interpreted and applied § 973.13 is a question that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
the court correctly interpreted and applied § 973.13 is a question that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., 2011 WI 28, ¶33, 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117602 - 2017-09-21
a new factor presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id., 2011 WI 28, ¶33, 333
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117602 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 151
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶9. We No. 2008AP2760 10 address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41491 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶9. We No. 2008AP2760 10 address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41491 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Joseph Conway, Jr. v. Board of the Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
of an agency’s power, we interpret the statute de novo, giving no deference to the agency’s opinion. Grafft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3754 - 2017-09-19
of an agency’s power, we interpret the statute de novo, giving no deference to the agency’s opinion. Grafft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3754 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The Town’s Summary Judgment Arguments ¶15 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34785 - 2014-09-15
. The Town’s Summary Judgment Arguments ¶15 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 111
and interest of $136,864.67. David moved for de novo review in the circuit court, disputing the calculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28319 - 2014-09-15
and interest of $136,864.67. David moved for de novo review in the circuit court, disputing the calculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28319 - 2014-09-15
WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP422-CR Complete Title ...
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95201 - 2013-05-28
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95201 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
885, 891. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
885, 891. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
Madison Teachers Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
of arbitrability de novo. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass’n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253 N.W.2d 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6172 - 2005-03-31
of arbitrability de novo. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v. Jefferson Educ. Ass’n, 78 Wis. 2d 94, 106, 253 N.W.2d 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6172 - 2005-03-31