Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
WI APP 87
2015 WI APP 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2014AP2977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149692 - 2017-09-21
2015 WI APP 87 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2014AP2977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be “too low” given that Ferraro committed this offense while the Rock County case was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529174 - 2022-06-08
be “too low” given that Ferraro committed this offense while the Rock County case was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529174 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
Robert Wagoner v. City of Milwaukee
2001 WI App 292 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3690 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 292 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0623
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3690 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kramer Business Service, Inc. v. Hyperion, Inc.
the small claims jurisdictional limit of $5,000, and the case was assigned to a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
the small claims jurisdictional limit of $5,000, and the case was assigned to a circuit court judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2976 - 2017-09-19
State v. Khounmy Lanoi
officers testified during the State’s case-in-chief that Lanoi declined to speak to them upon their arrival
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12278 - 2005-03-31
officers testified during the State’s case-in-chief that Lanoi declined to speak to them upon their arrival
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12278 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). In this case, the alleged exposure occurred within the same time period. No. 2014AP997-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
). In this case, the alleged exposure occurred within the same time period. No. 2014AP997-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy nor due process prohibits a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
jeopardy nor due process prohibits a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
2006 WI APP 243
2006 WI App 243 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP835 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26798 - 2006-11-20
2006 WI App 243 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP835 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26798 - 2006-11-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in these consolidated cases pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 Nos. 2023AP180-CRNM 2023AP181-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
in these consolidated cases pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 Nos. 2023AP180-CRNM 2023AP181-CRNM 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
2000 WI 39 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0500 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17484 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI 39 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-0500 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17484 - 2017-09-21