Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 30066 for de.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
WI 120
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55543 - 2014-09-15
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James L. Buzzell v. Karen J. Buzzell
, __ Wis. 2d __, 634 N.W.2d 544. However, we review the court’s legal conclusions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3469 - 2017-09-20
, __ Wis. 2d __, 634 N.W.2d 544. However, we review the court’s legal conclusions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3469 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 15
review de novo. Id., ¶8; Currier, 288 Wis. 2d 693, ¶9; Weisensel v. DHSS, 179 Wis. 2d 637, 642, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770262 - 2024-04-10
review de novo. Id., ¶8; Currier, 288 Wis. 2d 693, ¶9; Weisensel v. DHSS, 179 Wis. 2d 637, 642, 508
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770262 - 2024-04-10
[PDF]
WI APP 70
provision in WIS. STAT. § 704.17(2)(b). The circuit court agreed. Our review of this legal issue is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21
provision in WIS. STAT. § 704.17(2)(b). The circuit court agreed. Our review of this legal issue is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michael E. McMorrow v. State Superintendent of Public Instruction
weight” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15526 - 2017-09-21
weight” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15526 - 2017-09-21
Mared Industries, Inc. v. Alan Mansfield
questions of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6048 - 2005-03-31
questions of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6048 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 187
judgment. See id., ¶60. We review the application of law to agreed-on facts de novo. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29616 - 2007-10-27
judgment. See id., ¶60. We review the application of law to agreed-on facts de novo. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29616 - 2007-10-27
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question we review de novo. State v. Miller, 2009 WI App 111, ¶31, 320 Wis. 2d 724, 772 N.W.2d 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193269 - 2017-09-21
is a question we review de novo. State v. Miller, 2009 WI App 111, ¶31, 320 Wis. 2d 724, 772 N.W.2d 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193269 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
. The application of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19
. The application of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19