Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 30178 for de.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 30178 for de.
State v. Michael Doud
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
within statutory limitations on what a court may order is a question of law that we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5642 - 2005-03-31
Michael E. McMorrow v. State Superintendent of Public Instruction
” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de novo” review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15526 - 2005-03-31
” deference will apply when “the decision is very nearly one of first impression[]”; and (3) “de novo” review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15526 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stephanie M. Kaplan v. Susan Riseling
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11560 - 2017-09-19
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11560 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
Amy B. Reardon v. David O. Braeger
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
ruling merits de novo review because it requires applying undisputed facts to a statute. In other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113164 - 2017-09-21
. “The application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8412 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8412 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appellate courts review de novo. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 369, 734 N.W.2d 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82323 - 2014-09-15
appellate courts review de novo. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 369, 734 N.W.2d 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82323 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Vernell T. Williams
the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4929 - 2017-09-19
the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4929 - 2017-09-19
Rosa E. Fromm v. William P. Fromm
this court reviews de novo. Friebel, 181 Wis. 2d at 293. In light of the documentary evidence, neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2714 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. Friebel, 181 Wis. 2d at 293. In light of the documentary evidence, neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2714 - 2005-03-31