Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26151 - 26160 of 29967 for de.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 21 & 28, 2019
claims for compensation for donning and doffing activities subject to the doctrine of de minimis non
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248998 - 2019-10-17

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2013
, John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2011AP1566 United Concrete & Construction v. Red-D-Mix Concrete
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95172 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2006
such certifications from the Court of Appeals. The case began in Dane County Circuit Court, Judge Robert De Chambeau
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is not entitled to relief. Id. Both determinations are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757140 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] Madison Teachers Inc. v. Madison Metropolitan School District
in court; in that case the court decides the issue of arbitrability de novo. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 10 v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6172 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Johnnie Carprue
a violation of due process and prevented him from receiving a fair trial. Our review is de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5787 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
N.W.2d 221, 222–223 (Ct. App. 1997). We also review de novo the trial court’s decision whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5788 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132116 - 2014-12-22

State v. Glenn Allen Thayer
construction that we review de novo. See State v. Paulick, 213 Wis. 2d 432, 435, 570 N.W.2d 626 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14950 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680390 - 2023-07-19