Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26151 - 26160 of 30191 for de.
Search results 26151 - 26160 of 30191 for de.
State v. Peter J. Davies
. The appeal thus presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5737 - 2005-03-31
. The appeal thus presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Scull, 361 Wis. 2d 288, ¶16. Put differently, we review de novo the ultimate question of “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
. Scull, 361 Wis. 2d 288, ¶16. Put differently, we review de novo the ultimate question of “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
Banc One Building Management Corporation v. W.R. Grace Co.--Conn.
, and that any other property damages are de minimis or coincidental to these economic damages. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9987 - 2005-03-31
, and that any other property damages are de minimis or coincidental to these economic damages. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9987 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marlon O. Evans
was the armed robbery of Susan Rogan, which occurred on October 15, 2002, in a cul-de-sac garage area behind her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18399 - 2005-06-06
was the armed robbery of Susan Rogan, which occurred on October 15, 2002, in a cul-de-sac garage area behind her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18399 - 2005-06-06
Clairene D. Hunt v. Clarendon National Insurance Service, Inc.
The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Lambert v. Wrensch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7192 - 2005-03-31
The interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Lambert v. Wrensch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7192 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark W. Roob
, are both legal questions, which we review de novo. State v. Krawczyk, 2003 WI App 6, ¶10, 259 Wis. 2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
, are both legal questions, which we review de novo. State v. Krawczyk, 2003 WI App 6, ¶10, 259 Wis. 2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI App 206
(but not LaVerne’s) and refused to modify the child support. James brought a de novo motion in front of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
(but not LaVerne’s) and refused to modify the child support. James brought a de novo motion in front of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29972 - 2007-09-25
State v. Mark R. Johnson
of a statute and application to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19
of a statute and application to a given set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19351 - 2005-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in a better position to interpret the statute than a reviewing court. .... We apply de novo review when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107103 - 2014-01-21
in a better position to interpret the statute than a reviewing court. .... We apply de novo review when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107103 - 2014-01-21
Mared Industries, Inc. v. Alan Mansfield
questions of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6048 - 2005-03-31
questions of law that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000 WI App 176, ¶11, 238 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6048 - 2005-03-31