Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26151 - 26160 of 30185 for de.
Search results 26151 - 26160 of 30185 for de.
[PDF]
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WI App 80, ¶18, 365 Wis. 2d 257, 872 N.W.2d 357 (“Without any facts on which to base our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20
WI App 80, ¶18, 365 Wis. 2d 257, 872 N.W.2d 357 (“Without any facts on which to base our de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840302 - 2024-08-20
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
. ¶22 Generally, we review summary judgments de novo employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
. ¶22 Generally, we review summary judgments de novo employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Susan K. Roemer v. Susan Riseling
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11559 - 2017-09-19
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11559 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to a speedy trial.[1] Our review of an issue of constitutional dimensions is de novo. State v. Borhegyi, 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28760 - 2007-04-24
to a speedy trial.[1] Our review of an issue of constitutional dimensions is de novo. State v. Borhegyi, 222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28760 - 2007-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, because we review summary judgment motions de novo, we are not precluded from considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31145 - 2007-12-12
. However, because we review summary judgment motions de novo, we are not precluded from considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31145 - 2007-12-12
ANR Pipeline Company v.
can be granted are matters of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9942 - 2005-03-31
can be granted are matters of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9942 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Standard of Review ¶14 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85378 - 2012-07-25
] Standard of Review ¶14 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85378 - 2012-07-25
Lenticular Europe, LLC v. William T. Cunnally
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph Steffes
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of constitutional principles to those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31