Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26221 - 26230 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26221 - 26230 of 29823 for des.
Frontsheet
on a question of law, our review is de novo. Id.; Gulmire v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2004 WI App 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15
on a question of law, our review is de novo. Id.; Gulmire v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 2004 WI App 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15
State v. Jerry J. Meeks
. This presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. If the circuit court made an error
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16471 - 2015-08-10
. This presents a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. If the circuit court made an error
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16471 - 2015-08-10
State v. Donald L. Long
, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7736 - 2005-03-31
, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7736 - 2005-03-31
Fred A. Barry v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
of law that we review de novo. Geiger v. Milwaukee Guardian Ins. Co., 188 Wis. 2d 333, 336, 524 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17432 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Geiger v. Milwaukee Guardian Ins. Co., 188 Wis. 2d 333, 336, 524 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17432 - 2005-03-31
ECO, Inc v. City of Elkhorn
facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4868 - 2005-03-31
facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adverse possession is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶19 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982819 - 2025-07-15
adverse possession is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶19 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982819 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
WI App 58
reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95201 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W.2d 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95201 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
subject to a de novo standard of review. See id. While we appreciate and consider the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14869 - 2017-09-21
subject to a de novo standard of review. See id. While we appreciate and consider the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dustin Dowhower v. Simon Marquez
that is reviewed de novo. The same rules of construction that govern general contracts are applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3977 - 2017-09-20
that is reviewed de novo. The same rules of construction that govern general contracts are applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3977 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Clemente Lamont Alexander
deficiently is an issue that we must review de novo. See id. ¶20 “An attorney’s strategic decision based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17821 - 2017-09-21
deficiently is an issue that we must review de novo. See id. ¶20 “An attorney’s strategic decision based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17821 - 2017-09-21