Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26221 - 26230 of 57740 for id.

James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
of § 852.01(2m), Stats., and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 852.01(2m)(br). Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9972 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
have understood the words to mean.’” Id., ¶17 (quoting Arnold P. Anderson, Wisconsin Insurance Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74885 - 2011-12-05

[PDF] State v. Kenneth M. Davis
no discretion and must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. Whether a motion alleges facts that, if true, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6344 - 2017-09-19

2006 WI APP 253
] See id. That is, Basley concedes that the requirements for a plea colloquy enunciated in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27297 - 2006-12-19

[PDF] WI App 153
definitional meaning.” See id. We must also keep in mind that “[c]ontext is important to meaning. So, too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104787 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Group
, we value a trial court’s decision on such a question. See id. The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
an estate in the property in fee simple absolute, which the county could then pass on. Id. at 639. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28964 - 2013-06-19

State v. Eric L. Small
reasons, or whether its purpose is dilatory. See id., 146 Wis.2d at 360, 432 N.W.2d at 91; State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14166 - 2006-08-07

[PDF] International Paper Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
benefits presents a mixed question of fact and law. See id. at 931 (When the question on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3500 - 2017-09-19