Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26231 - 26240 of 30191 for de.
Search results 26231 - 26240 of 30191 for de.
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id. at 313-14. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id. at 313-14. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
WI App 163 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP109 Complete Title of...
. The interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74298 - 2011-12-13
. The interpretation and application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74298 - 2011-12-13
Frontsheet
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103256 - 2013-10-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156718 - 2017-09-21
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156718 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Nowell v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Nowell v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
WI App 156 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2393-CR Complete Titl...
at trial. This is a statutory construction question that we review de novo. See Stuart v. Weisflog’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
at trial. This is a statutory construction question that we review de novo. See Stuart v. Weisflog’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial, because those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7439 - 2005-03-31
erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial, because those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
proportional representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239586 - 2019-10-01
proportional representation is not required.” Id. There is no “de minimus disparity [that] amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239586 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of law, which we review de novo.” Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶12, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29381 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo.” Robin K. v. Lamanda M., 2006 WI 68, ¶12, 291 Wis. 2d 333, 718
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29381 - 2014-09-15