Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26291 - 26300 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 26291 - 26300 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon the no-merit report and an independent review of the circuit court records, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138362 - 2017-09-21
upon the no-merit report and an independent review of the circuit court records, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
challenging a sentence has a burden to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
challenging a sentence has a burden to show an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jessie White
that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
that these possible issues have no arguable merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9936 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed.” The only document in the Record related to these previous cases is an order (dated April 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11
dismissed.” The only document in the Record related to these previous cases is an order (dated April 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246409 - 2019-09-11
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the report, and our independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246409 - 2019-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey J. Czerniak
of the case with citations to the record, in violation of WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) and (3) of the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5876 - 2017-09-19
of the case with citations to the record, in violation of WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) and (3) of the rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5876 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425953 - 2021-09-21
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425953 - 2021-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from the internet. Kappus stressed that there was no indication in the record that any of the victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72963 - 2011-10-31
from the internet. Kappus stressed that there was no indication in the record that any of the victims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72963 - 2011-10-31
CA Blank Order
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
State v. Richard G. Lawrence
colloquy [with] the defendant … or by referring to some portion of the record or communication between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3535 - 2005-03-31
colloquy [with] the defendant … or by referring to some portion of the record or communication between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3535 - 2005-03-31