Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2631 - 2640 of 15434 for fee.
Search results 2631 - 2640 of 15434 for fee.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Elizabeth’s attorney fees for responding to his motion. We affirm. ¶2 Frederick and Elizabeth were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2006-10-16
Elizabeth’s attorney fees for responding to his motion. We affirm. ¶2 Frederick and Elizabeth were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
Melanie Guth v. Timothy Guth
denying her request for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3846 - 2017-09-20
denying her request for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3846 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to in the lease as a reduction in rent was a rental discount, not a late fee. Because retaliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32887 - 2014-09-15
to in the lease as a reduction in rent was a rental discount, not a late fee. Because retaliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32887 - 2014-09-15
Melanie Guth v. Timothy Guth
for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie argues that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie argues that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
Michael Kidd v. Dianna L. McMaster
erred when it awarded McMaster all of her attorney fees because that amount included attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6030 - 2005-03-31
erred when it awarded McMaster all of her attorney fees because that amount included attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6030 - 2005-03-31
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
support, and which further required him to contribute toward his former wife’s costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
support, and which further required him to contribute toward his former wife’s costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
moves for an award of attorney’s fees on the ground that the entire appeal is frivolous. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102018 - 2013-09-12
moves for an award of attorney’s fees on the ground that the entire appeal is frivolous. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102018 - 2013-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
in rent was a rental discount, not a late fee. Because retaliation was not available as a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32887 - 2008-06-02
in rent was a rental discount, not a late fee. Because retaliation was not available as a defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32887 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
court erred in requiring him to contribute toward Elizabeth’s attorney fees for responding to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26831 - 2014-09-15
court erred in requiring him to contribute toward Elizabeth’s attorney fees for responding to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26831 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
to contribute toward his former wife’s costs and attorney fees. Upon reviewing the No. 98-1080 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
to contribute toward his former wife’s costs and attorney fees. Upon reviewing the No. 98-1080 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15