Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26321 - 26330 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 26321 - 26330 of 58483 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
At the conclusion of the trial, the court granted the eviction and denied Schehr’s counterclaim. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73608 - 2011-11-09
At the conclusion of the trial, the court granted the eviction and denied Schehr’s counterclaim. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73608 - 2011-11-09
Kenneth Onapolis v. State
claims the trial court erred in not recognizing that the Rule of Specialty incorporated in the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
claims the trial court erred in not recognizing that the Rule of Specialty incorporated in the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24886 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
. STAT. § 939.625 (1997-98).1 During Trawitzki’s jury trial, three of the co-perpetrators testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15917 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 939.625 (1997-98).1 During Trawitzki’s jury trial, three of the co-perpetrators testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15917 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ary L. Jones, Sr.
, Sr., claimed to have been a prisoner of war in Vietnam, a circumstance that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
, Sr., claimed to have been a prisoner of war in Vietnam, a circumstance that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4558 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that trial counsel was No. 2012AP1752-CR 2 ineffective for not objecting to prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
contends that trial counsel was No. 2012AP1752-CR 2 ineffective for not objecting to prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Linda L. McCoy
violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motions to suppress and dismiss. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
violated the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied the motions to suppress and dismiss. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15
, his postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Farr
) that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with respect to the weapons enhancer. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11376 - 2017-09-19
) that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury with respect to the weapons enhancer. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11376 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Susan Monfils v. Marlyn Charles
within the meaning of the business exclusion.1 We conclude that the trial court erred by considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12387 - 2017-09-21
within the meaning of the business exclusion.1 We conclude that the trial court erred by considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12387 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sheila E. Novin
§ 49.49(1)(a)1 and 2, Stats.[1] She also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12627 - 2005-03-31
§ 49.49(1)(a)1 and 2, Stats.[1] She also appeals from the trial court’s order denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12627 - 2005-03-31