Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26331 - 26340 of 57351 for id.

State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
convictions must be admitted by the defendant or proved by the State. See id. Whether Vines’ prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31

09AP2777 State v. Scott W. Able.doc
they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, based on the historical facts, we review de novo whether a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48772 - 2010-04-13

[PDF] John E. Zenner v. Wisconsin Oven Corporation
on review of the trial court’s decision on that motion. See id. An appellate court may not overturn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11418 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and we make all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. Id. “This court does not add facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608828 - 2023-01-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
relevant to the crime of arrest might be found in the vehicle.’” Id. at 343 (quoted source omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134925 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
court erroneously exercised its discretion. See id. at 448, 531 N.W.2d at 613. “To properly exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that there is a genuine issue of material fact, summary judgment shall be entered against that party. Id. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=810188 - 2024-06-12

State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
knowingly and voluntarily waived his or her right to counsel. Id. at 204. To resolve the issue, we must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31

John E. Zenner v. Wisconsin Oven Corporation
of the trial court’s decision on that motion. See id. An appellate court may not overturn a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11418 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration.” Id. We thus compare the issues raised in the reconsideration motion with the issues disposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49478 - 2010-05-03