Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
Allen J. Thomas v. State
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Harr v. Judy Smith
the complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm. ¶2 Harr was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
the complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm. ¶2 Harr was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order dismissing his claims related to whether he should have received an insurance payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
an order dismissing his claims related to whether he should have received an insurance payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
State v. Charles D. Brabant
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the claim made in his motion and seeks an evidentiary hearing on it. “We need finality in our litigation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
the claim made in his motion and seeks an evidentiary hearing on it. “We need finality in our litigation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph McGowan
, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5667 - 2017-09-19
, appeals orders denying his claim for additional sentence credit. He asserts a right to 311 more days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5667 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
claims of error and we therefore affirm the order. ¶2 In February 1984, a jury convicted Vance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47629 - 2010-03-08
claims of error and we therefore affirm the order. ¶2 In February 1984, a jury convicted Vance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47629 - 2010-03-08