Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26371 - 26380 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s promises. Specifically, he claims that his trial counsel told him that “he would only get a 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026124 - 2025-10-22
counsel’s promises. Specifically, he claims that his trial counsel told him that “he would only get a 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026124 - 2025-10-22
State v. Peggy Sue Lockett
inmate's affidavit, claiming that Smith confessed that she sold the fur coats. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
inmate's affidavit, claiming that Smith confessed that she sold the fur coats. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
) (1987-88). Huber also explicitly did not seek to challenge his revocation order. If Huber claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30292 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim that could have been raised in a prior postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim that could have been raised in a prior postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435191 - 2021-10-06
Allen J. Thomas v. State
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
Daniel Harr v. Judy Smith
the complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm. ¶2 Harr was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
the complaint for failure to state a claim. We affirm. ¶2 Harr was formerly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order dismissing his claims related to whether he should have received an insurance payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
an order dismissing his claims related to whether he should have received an insurance payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
State v. Charles D. Brabant
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion after a hearing. We, too, rejected the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
litigation.” State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18
litigation.” State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18