Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. ¶8 Here, the trial court agreed with Wesley that, given the lack of a strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65601 - 2011-06-14
de novo. Id. ¶8 Here, the trial court agreed with Wesley that, given the lack of a strategic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65601 - 2011-06-14
State v. Donald L. Long
, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7736 - 2005-03-31
, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7736 - 2005-03-31
Richard P. Yatso v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin
contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d 667, 672
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4263 - 2005-03-31
contract presents a question of law which we review de novo. Tower Ins. Co. v. Chang, 230 Wis. 2d 667, 672
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4263 - 2005-03-31
Kurt F. Froebel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 60
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported by credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557628 - 2022-08-23
conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported by credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557628 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
Columbus Park Housing Corporation v. City of Kenosha
this judgment. ¶8 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5034 - 2017-09-19
this judgment. ¶8 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5034 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cheryl Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de novo without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16867 - 2017-09-21
as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de novo without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16867 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 50
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21