Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 26381 - 26390 of 29832 for des.
Kurt F. Froebel v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
court, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Loomis v. Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12257 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 60
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported by credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557628 - 2022-08-23
conclusions de novo; however, we defer to LIRC’s findings of fact “if they are supported by credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557628 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
Columbus Park Housing Corporation v. City of Kenosha
this judgment. ¶8 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5034 - 2017-09-19
this judgment. ¶8 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5034 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cheryl Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company
as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de novo without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16867 - 2017-09-21
as it applies to a set of facts. This presents a question of law which we approach de novo without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16867 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 50
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
purposes presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶23; City of South Milwaukee v. Kester
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142164 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lickety Split Drive-In, Inc. v. American States Insurance Company
. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Our review is de novo. Policemen’s Annuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5880 - 2017-09-19
. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987). Our review is de novo. Policemen’s Annuity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5880 - 2017-09-19
Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
. As to the legal issues, such as the construction of the divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16581 - 2005-03-31
. As to the legal issues, such as the construction of the divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21