Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2641 - 2650 of 6659 for mix.

COURT OF APPEALS
is a mixed standard of review. First, we determine whether the motion on its face alleges sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16

State v. Chad Williams
in the outcome.” See id., 466 U.S. at 694. ¶16 Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14046 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a hearing for the relief requested is subject to a mixed standard of review. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11

Raymond L. Harwick v. Robert F. Black
possession determination presents a mixed question of fact and law, requiring findings concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14762 - 2005-03-31

Robert K. Rowe v. Attorneys' Liability Assurance Society, Inc.
orders of the circuit court. In some ways, however, the parties’ briefs seem to mix and match
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13117 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for the relief requested is a mixed standard of review. First, we determine whether the motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09

State v. Joanne Sekula
and prejudice components of the ineffectiveness inquiry are mixed questions of fact and law, the question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3712 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. ¶5 Whether counsel’s actions were deficient or prejudicial is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135949 - 2015-03-03

COURT OF APPEALS
. A. Substantial Change ¶9 Whether there has been a substantial change in circumstances is a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91486 - 2013-01-09

State v. Parish D. Perkins
assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 698. We will not reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14137 - 2005-03-31