Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26401 - 26410 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26401 - 26410 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance was deficient or prejudicial are each questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
performance was deficient or prejudicial are each questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=352008 - 2021-04-01
[PDF]
312. ¶17 Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Chapman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969448 - 2025-06-12
312. ¶17 Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de novo. Chapman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969448 - 2025-06-12
[PDF]
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 184
is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, ¶14, 251 Wis. 2d 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27, ¶14, 251 Wis. 2d 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34606 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
of law which we review de novo. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis.2d 154, 176, 528 N.W.2d 55, 63 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11506 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis.2d 154, 176, 528 N.W.2d 55, 63 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11506 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles Hudson
) No. 98-0628-CR 10 trial is a constitutional question, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13703 - 2014-09-15
) No. 98-0628-CR 10 trial is a constitutional question, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13703 - 2014-09-15
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Urquhart Companies
in an action as a matter of right under Wis. Stat. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19623 - 2005-10-27
in an action as a matter of right under Wis. Stat. § 803.09(1) is a question of law we decide de novo. Armada
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19623 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360479 - 2021-04-27
performance was deficient and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360479 - 2021-04-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245557 - 2019-08-28
the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245557 - 2019-08-28
[PDF]
WI App 50
-representation was violated presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 204. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35920 - 2014-09-15
-representation was violated presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. at 204. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35920 - 2014-09-15