Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26421 - 26430 of 29827 for des.
Search results 26421 - 26430 of 29827 for des.
State v. Garland Hampton
a defense was violated is a question of `constitutional fact' that we review de novo.” Id. at 432, 536 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10257 - 2005-03-31
a defense was violated is a question of `constitutional fact' that we review de novo.” Id. at 432, 536 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10257 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 60
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
The interpretation of statutes is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Steldt v. McCaughtry, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48168 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 12. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074182 - 2026-02-11
decides de novo. State v. Swinson, 2003 WI App 45, ¶57, 261 Wis. 2d 633, 660 N.W.2d 12. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074182 - 2026-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 10, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Cole v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63752 - 2011-05-09
or denial of a summary judgment motion de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Cole v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63752 - 2011-05-09
WI APP 127 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2875 Complete Title o...
judgment. Whether the trial court applied the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88558 - 2012-12-13
judgment. Whether the trial court applied the proper legal standard is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88558 - 2012-12-13
[PDF]
League of Wisconsin Municipalities v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
review is de novo, but in deciding this question of law, we are to derive “benefit” from the experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3852 - 2017-09-20
review is de novo, but in deciding this question of law, we are to derive “benefit” from the experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3852 - 2017-09-20
Gordon J. Grube v. John L. Daun
, 668, 476 N.W.2d 593 (Ct. App. 1991). Thus, a question of law is presented which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17055 - 2005-03-31
, 668, 476 N.W.2d 593 (Ct. App. 1991). Thus, a question of law is presented which we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17055 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Edwin W. Conmey
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20616 - 2005-12-12
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20616 - 2005-12-12
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
summary judgment and did not make any factual determinations. Accordingly, we review the issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9994 - 2005-03-31
summary judgment and did not make any factual determinations. Accordingly, we review the issue de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9994 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
more than de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding. (6) A judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17561 - 2005-03-31
more than de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding. (6) A judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17561 - 2005-03-31