Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26511 - 26520 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 26511 - 26520 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
, the guard was not on duty at the time of the hearing, and one of the inmates was not mentioned in the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13550 - 2005-03-31
, the guard was not on duty at the time of the hearing, and one of the inmates was not mentioned in the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13550 - 2005-03-31
State v. James M. Welter
When considering whether a magistrate properly issued a search warrant, this court’s duty is to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3110 - 2005-03-31
When considering whether a magistrate properly issued a search warrant, this court’s duty is to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3110 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
order, before Braden was born and before the parties married. The court’s duty to give paramount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76793 - 2012-01-18
order, before Braden was born and before the parties married. The court’s duty to give paramount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76793 - 2012-01-18
SCR CHAPTER 11
as a reserve judge, nor the performance of conciliation or pretrial duties under section 807.09 of the statutes
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81876 - 2012-04-29
as a reserve judge, nor the performance of conciliation or pretrial duties under section 807.09 of the statutes
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81876 - 2012-04-29
Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
if the security director had failed in this duty, Cubero cannot reasonably argue that any such omission prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-10-10
if the security director had failed in this duty, Cubero cannot reasonably argue that any such omission prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8239 - 2005-10-10
[PDF]
Quinn Johnson v. Michael J. Sullivan
of the prisoners while delegating day-to-day supervision. The DOC’s duties in this respect vary little depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2820 - 2017-09-19
of the prisoners while delegating day-to-day supervision. The DOC’s duties in this respect vary little depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2820 - 2017-09-19
Harold E. Krause, Jr. v.
that Harold E. Krause, Jr. comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17234 - 2005-03-31
that Harold E. Krause, Jr. comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Helen L. Rohland v. London Square Mall
of dismissal. We disagree. The Rohlands allege that the mall was negligent and violated its duty under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10099 - 2017-09-19
of dismissal. We disagree. The Rohlands allege that the mall was negligent and violated its duty under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10099 - 2017-09-19
Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
death and that, as personal representative, it was her duty to satisfy that debt. Gypsum did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2012-07-16
death and that, as personal representative, it was her duty to satisfy that debt. Gypsum did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2012-07-16
State v. David Scott Mathis
, we note that “[i]t is always the duty of this court in considering any appeal to resolve, even sua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3074 - 2005-03-31
, we note that “[i]t is always the duty of this court in considering any appeal to resolve, even sua
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3074 - 2005-03-31