Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26571 - 26580 of 29821 for des.

[PDF] WI App 130
are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See WIREdata, Inc. v. Village of Sussex, 2008 WI 69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39799 - 2014-09-15

State v. Melvin R. Tucker
N.W.2d 883, 885 (1985). Whether charges are multiplicitous is an issue subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7864 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125349 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilt in a criminal prosecution is a question of law, subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294320 - 2020-10-06

[PDF] State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2294 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2295 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Reginald C. Bruskewitz v. City of Madison
. 2d 376, 385, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo to the Common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3055 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 235
. ¶11 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards and methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30458 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Heather A. Rippl v. Board of Bar Examiners
, but the court is obligated to make its legal determinations de novo. Matter of Bar Admission of Rusch, 171
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16429 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192436 - 2017-09-21