Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 26671 - 26680 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 recent postconviction motion to withdraw his plea and have a new trial. 1 Caldwell contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109744 - 2017-09-21
2 recent postconviction motion to withdraw his plea and have a new trial. 1 Caldwell contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109744 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from an order denying his most recent postconviction motion to withdraw his plea and have a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109744 - 2014-03-31
appeals from an order denying his most recent postconviction motion to withdraw his plea and have a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109744 - 2014-03-31
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
that Muller could not assert her own claim because her motion to intervene came after the statutory deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
that Muller could not assert her own claim because her motion to intervene came after the statutory deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Protasiewicz)
a motion for my recusal. State v. Henley, 2011 WI 67, ¶26, 338 Wis. 2d 610, 802 N.W.2d 175. If the law
/supreme/docs/25xx1330protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
a motion for my recusal. State v. Henley, 2011 WI 67, ¶26, 338 Wis. 2d 610, 802 N.W.2d 175. If the law
/supreme/docs/25xx1330protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Protasiewicz)
Page 1 of 11 BOTHFELD v. WIS. ELECTIONS COMM’N 2025XX1438 2 I alone decide a motion
/supreme/docs/25xx1438protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
Page 1 of 11 BOTHFELD v. WIS. ELECTIONS COMM’N 2025XX1438 2 I alone decide a motion
/supreme/docs/25xx1438protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief from all of the judgments. (Court of Appeals case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8202 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief from all of the judgments. (Court of Appeals case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Konshak
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief from all of the judgments. (Court of Appeals case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8201 - 2017-09-19
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief from all of the judgments. (Court of Appeals case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8201 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for No. 2017AP1722-CR 2 postconviction relief. In that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
an order denying his motion for No. 2017AP1722-CR 2 postconviction relief. In that motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Shawn Paholke appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Shawn Paholke appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. He also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judicial recusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04
judgment. He also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for judicial recusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04