Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26721 - 26730 of 33807 for dismissal.
Search results 26721 - 26730 of 33807 for dismissal.
COURT OF APPEALS
was apparently dismissed by stipulation without the entry of a permanent injunction. [2] All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103124 - 2013-10-16
was apparently dismissed by stipulation without the entry of a permanent injunction. [2] All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103124 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
a no contest plea to counts one, two and three; in exchange, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
a no contest plea to counts one, two and three; in exchange, counts four through sixteen would be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a crime and agreed to dismiss and read in a second count No. 2022AP2219-CR 3 related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
to a crime and agreed to dismiss and read in a second count No. 2022AP2219-CR 3 related
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718650 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Chong Leng Lee
agreed to plead no contest to the three felony charges. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19895 - 2017-09-21
agreed to plead no contest to the three felony charges. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19895 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
within forty-eight hours of arrest is not a jurisdictional defect and is not grounds for dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349311 - 2021-03-30
within forty-eight hours of arrest is not a jurisdictional defect and is not grounds for dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349311 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissed and read in. On eight counts of violating a harassment injunction, the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21
dismissed and read in. On eight counts of violating a harassment injunction, the circuit court entered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
count against him. The other counts were dismissed and read in. The circuit court then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
count against him. The other counts were dismissed and read in. The circuit court then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
dismissed and read in. Prior to sentencing, Dornbrookâs counsel asked to be allowed to withdraw because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
dismissed and read in. Prior to sentencing, Dornbrookâs counsel asked to be allowed to withdraw because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
or no-contest pleas to counts three, four, five, eight and nine, the remaining charges would be dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137168 - 2015-03-16
or no-contest pleas to counts three, four, five, eight and nine, the remaining charges would be dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137168 - 2015-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the October 25, 2013 order on December 20, 2013. By order dated January 28, 2014, we dismissed that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27
the October 25, 2013 order on December 20, 2013. By order dated January 28, 2014, we dismissed that appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145111 - 2015-07-27