Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26761 - 26770 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 26761 - 26770 of 83395 for simple case search.
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
Virginia Wustrack v. Beverly Enterprises-Wisconsin, Inc.
CURIAM. Virginia Wustrack appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her case for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11191 - 2006-08-29
CURIAM. Virginia Wustrack appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her case for failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11191 - 2006-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge may appropriately consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74188 - 2014-09-15
judge may appropriately consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we No. 2016AP2272 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202770 - 2017-11-16
of the briefs and record, we No. 2016AP2272 2 conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202770 - 2017-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we will address a forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2014-11-21
consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we will address a forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2014-11-21
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2013-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
is unable to attend.” In this case, the guardian ad litem made an oral statement to the court “asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2011-03-29
is unable to attend.” In this case, the guardian ad litem made an oral statement to the court “asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2011-03-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
2013 WI 28 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP825 & 2011AP826 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94787 - 2013-05-27
2013 WI 28 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2011AP825 & 2011AP826 Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94787 - 2013-05-27
[PDF]
WI 28
2013 WI 28 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP825 & 2011AP826 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94787 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI 28 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2011AP825 & 2011AP826 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94787 - 2014-09-15