Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26771 - 26780 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] WI 80
No. 2005AP1730 10 it. Whether such a duty existed presents a question of law. Id. III ¶21
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29497 - 2014-09-15

James D. Vance v. Thomas H. Thiede
they are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence, id. at 154, that is, unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2839 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky J. Fortier
that there is no merit to the indigent’s appeal.” Id. at 739. The Court held that: [I]f counsel finds his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20809 - 2006-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
or more of the statutorily enumerated grounds for termination of parental rights exist.” Id. “[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25

State v. Tyren E. Black
that the defendant knowingly had a firearm under his “actual physical control.” See id. at 16. Inherent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15046 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, at the owner’s option.” Id. ¶3 An order issued under WIS. STAT. § 66.0413(1)(b) must specify the required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112354 - 2017-09-21

State v. Latrina W.
of professional competent assistance.” Id. at 697. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7148 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 79
unless clearly erroneous. Id.; see also Wis. Stat. 805.17(2) (2007-08).[3] Whether those facts fulfill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36484 - 2011-02-07

State v. Ward J.
of professional competent assistance.” Id. at 697. There is a strong presumption that counsel “rendered adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7532 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 122
reach. Id. We review de novo a party’s contention that the trial court applied the incorrect legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69081 - 2014-09-15