Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 74615 for public records.
Search results 26781 - 26790 of 74615 for public records.
Robert Miesen v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
be taken for public use without just compensation therefor." [3] Miesen also argues that the appraisal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31
be taken for public use without just compensation therefor." [3] Miesen also argues that the appraisal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. We reject each of these contentions, and affirm. Defective Appellate Record ¶2 Initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
in this case. We reject each of these contentions, and affirm. Defective Appellate Record ¶2 Initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45802 - 2010-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
Action Law v. Habush
, Conclusion and Order in its Order dated July 16, 1996 for the reasons set forth in the "Review of Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11251 - 2005-03-31
, Conclusion and Order in its Order dated July 16, 1996 for the reasons set forth in the "Review of Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11251 - 2005-03-31
State v. Percell L. Parker
from the record, in a manner that supports the trial court’s findings and decision. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
from the record, in a manner that supports the trial court’s findings and decision. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2620 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the raze order was posted on the property; the date the raze order was recorded with the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35245 - 2009-01-20
the raze order was posted on the property; the date the raze order was recorded with the Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35245 - 2009-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the county make such a determination. Instead, he had the land appraised and sold to the Public Land Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
that the county make such a determination. Instead, he had the land appraised and sold to the Public Land Trust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
Bridget C. v. Stephen J.C.
the children ….” He also states in general terms—and without citation to the record[1]—that Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14843 - 2005-03-31
the children ….” He also states in general terms—and without citation to the record[1]—that Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14843 - 2005-03-31
Debra Jungwirth v. Jefferson F. Ray, M.D.
exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record and reasons its way to a rational, legally sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8014 - 2005-03-31
exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record and reasons its way to a rational, legally sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8014 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are conclusive if supported by credible and substantial evidence in the record. See Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6) (2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
are conclusive if supported by credible and substantial evidence in the record. See Wis. Stat. § 102.23(6) (2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27