Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2691 - 2700 of 16407 for commenting.
Search results 2691 - 2700 of 16407 for commenting.
State v. Christina J.P.
. The court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need for the services she was currently receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13882 - 2005-03-31
. The court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need for the services she was currently receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christina J.P.
disturbance. The No. 98-1050 98-1051 9 court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13883 - 2014-09-15
disturbance. The No. 98-1050 98-1051 9 court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13883 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
judge’s comment here, that the lawyers knew the judge’s No. 2008AP427-CR 8 sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
judge’s comment here, that the lawyers knew the judge’s No. 2008AP427-CR 8 sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39848 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christina J.P.
disturbance. The No. 98-1050 98-1051 9 court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13882 - 2014-09-15
disturbance. The No. 98-1050 98-1051 9 court’s comments demonstrate that it recognized her need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13882 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The court then made its comments. It stated that it had read the PSI and the criminal complaint, listened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54673 - 2014-09-15
The court then made its comments. It stated that it had read the PSI and the criminal complaint, listened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54673 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that C.Y.K.’s comment about not needing medication was in reference to her anxiety medication, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148658 - 2017-09-21
that C.Y.K.’s comment about not needing medication was in reference to her anxiety medication, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148658 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Montgomery P. Avant
, violated the rule that prohibits a trial court from commenting on a witness’s testimony. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
, violated the rule that prohibits a trial court from commenting on a witness’s testimony. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6224 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Wienke
. At sentencing, the trial court's comments reflected consideration of Ed's thoughts on the appropriate sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10008 - 2017-09-19
. At sentencing, the trial court's comments reflected consideration of Ed's thoughts on the appropriate sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10008 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James I. Montroy
by the sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments at a postconviction motion hearing that it had not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
by the sentencing court’s after-the-fact comments at a postconviction motion hearing that it had not relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
State v. Lester Young
which, Young says, improperly commented on the credibility of another witness (Scott). At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31
which, Young says, improperly commented on the credibility of another witness (Scott). At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15919 - 2005-03-31