Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 33824 for dismissed.
Search results 26951 - 26960 of 33824 for dismissed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
two, false imprisonment as a repeater, with the State then moving to dismiss outright the remaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140559 - 2017-09-21
two, false imprisonment as a repeater, with the State then moving to dismiss outright the remaining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140559 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Count two was dismissed but read in. ¶3 At the end of the plea hearing, neither the State nor Highshaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
. Count two was dismissed but read in. ¶3 At the end of the plea hearing, neither the State nor Highshaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred when it continued the disposition hearing instead of dismissing the petition because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court erred when it continued the disposition hearing instead of dismissing the petition because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of a controlled substance, as party to a crime. The remaining charges were dismissed and read in. Nelis now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13
of a controlled substance, as party to a crime. The remaining charges were dismissed and read in. Nelis now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54421 - 2010-09-13
COURT OF APPEALS
. The remaining charges were dismissed and read in at sentencing. ¶8 The State had agreed not to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
. The remaining charges were dismissed and read in at sentencing. ¶8 The State had agreed not to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93385 - 2013-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
count against him. The other counts were dismissed and read in. The circuit court then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
count against him. The other counts were dismissed and read in. The circuit court then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
that I'd get off better. THE COURT: Because the case was being dismissed against you? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
that I'd get off better. THE COURT: Because the case was being dismissed against you? THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
or no-contest pleas to counts three, four, five, eight and nine, the remaining charges would be dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137168 - 2015-03-16
or no-contest pleas to counts three, four, five, eight and nine, the remaining charges would be dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137168 - 2015-03-16
COURT OF APPEALS
dismisses that testimony as “inherent[ly] unreliab[le] … blatant hearsay.” Its observation comes too late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06
dismisses that testimony as “inherent[ly] unreliab[le] … blatant hearsay.” Its observation comes too late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79054 - 2012-03-06