Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27011 - 27020 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 27011 - 27020 of 33989 for dismissal.
[PDF]
State v. Patricia K.S.
of conviction herein and dismissing this 4 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10638 - 2017-09-20
of conviction herein and dismissing this 4 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10638 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Butler
no contest pleas, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2973 - 2017-09-19
no contest pleas, the substantial battery charge was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Butler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2973 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cindy Schultz v. Victoria Wellens
a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to dismiss a complaint.” Mazurek v. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10372 - 2017-09-20
a writ of mandamus is treated as a motion to dismiss a complaint.” Mazurek v. Miller, 100 Wis.2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10372 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 17
In Wausau’s municipal court, Jusufi moved to dismiss the citations, contending the ordinance’s definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
In Wausau’s municipal court, Jusufi moved to dismiss the citations, contending the ordinance’s definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34744 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 At the close of the State’s case, Yeoman moved for dismissal or a directed verdict “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878592 - 2024-11-20
. ¶8 At the close of the State’s case, Yeoman moved for dismissal or a directed verdict “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878592 - 2024-11-20
State v. Richard G. Giese
). Giese pled guilty to count one and count two was dismissed. After judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
). Giese pled guilty to count one and count two was dismissed. After judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel was ineffective, we would still affirm the trial court’s dismissal order because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard C. Plank
and a $10,000 fine. The remaining charges would be dismissed and read in at sentencing. The State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
and a $10,000 fine. The remaining charges would be dismissed and read in at sentencing. The State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
with prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. Denner moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
with prohibited alcohol concentration in violation of § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. Denner moved to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to dismiss, but read in for sentencing purposes two additional counts of failure to comply with duty upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
to dismiss, but read in for sentencing purposes two additional counts of failure to comply with duty upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15