Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 30059 for de.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
review de novo. See Barber v. Nylund, 158 Wis. 2d 192, 195, 461 N.W.2d 809 (Ct. App. 1990) (“Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27163 - 2006-11-15
review de novo. See Barber v. Nylund, 158 Wis. 2d 192, 195, 461 N.W.2d 809 (Ct. App. 1990) (“Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27163 - 2006-11-15
2007 WI APP 205
, 429-30, 288 N.W.2d 815 (1980). We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29962 - 2007-09-25
, 429-30, 288 N.W.2d 815 (1980). We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29962 - 2007-09-25
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
converted James’ motion to one for summary judgment. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56357 - 2010-11-03
converted James’ motion to one for summary judgment. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56357 - 2010-11-03
State v. Danny C. Eesley
. Stat. § 976.05. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 976.05. This is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Sostre, 198 Wis. 2d 409
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17282 - 2005-03-31
Spriggie Hensley v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
presents an issue of statutory construction. We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16349 - 2005-03-31
presents an issue of statutory construction. We review questions of statutory construction de novo. State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16349 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph R. King
to effective assistance of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25477 - 2006-06-12
to effective assistance of counsel is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Harvey, 139 Wis. 2d 353
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25477 - 2006-06-12
Linda A. Ande v. Michael Rock
review de novo. [7] This part of the claim was initially focused on Dr. Amy Plumb and others who treated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3840 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. [7] This part of the claim was initially focused on Dr. Amy Plumb and others who treated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Polster
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however, “‘the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. If, however, “‘the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11