Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27081 - 27090 of 30059 for de.

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
is a question of law, which we review de novo. E.g., Stockbridge School Dist. v. Department of Pub. Instruction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey Stout
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792486 - 2024-04-24

[PDF] WI APP 4
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. West, 2011 WI 83, ¶22, 336 Wis. 2d 578, 800 N.W.2d 929
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131079 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=387021 - 2021-07-13

State v. Bruce A. Owen
the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case, we review this issue de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9715 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
review de novo. See Barber v. Nylund, 158 Wis. 2d 192, 195, 461 N.W.2d 809 (Ct. App. 1990) (“Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27163 - 2006-11-15

2007 WI APP 205
, 429-30, 288 N.W.2d 815 (1980). We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. City of Muskego
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29962 - 2007-09-25

John T. Morris v. Juneau County
review de novo. See Colby v. Columbia County 202 Wis. 2d 342, 349, 550 N.W.2d 124 (1996) (citing Pufahl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
converted James’ motion to one for summary judgment. ¶25 We review de novo the grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56357 - 2010-11-03