Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27111 - 27120 of 29823 for des.
Search results 27111 - 27120 of 29823 for des.
10AP466 City of Mequon v. James E. Haynor
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
of erroneous [exercise of] judicial discretion de novo.” Actually, Martindale establishes that a reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54057 - 2010-09-07
2010 WI APP 163
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21
Andrea Driver v. Housing Authority of Racine County
and the federal regulatory scheme. Because this case comes to us on summary judgment, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21280 - 2006-03-22
and the federal regulatory scheme. Because this case comes to us on summary judgment, our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21280 - 2006-03-22
State v. Jay A. Starkweather
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. However, if the motion does fail to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13808 - 2011-10-11
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. However, if the motion does fail to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13808 - 2011-10-11
State v. Edward L. Riley
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. 1. Was Riley’s detention valid under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Walworth County v. Therese B.
, which we review de novo. At a hearing on a petition for guardianship, the petitioner bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6363 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. At a hearing on a petition for guardianship, the petitioner bears the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6363 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 131
and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
and the interpretation of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo. Hillhaven Corp. v. DHFS, 232 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27514 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randall L. Behnke
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. We first examine trial counsel's alleged failure to ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9388 - 2017-09-19
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. We first examine trial counsel's alleged failure to ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9388 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which [an appellate] court approaches de novo without deference to the court[] below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280749 - 2020-08-20
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “Second, we apply constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280749 - 2020-08-20