Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27121 - 27130 of 29715 for des.

Frontsheet
that this court reviews de novo . . . ." Noffke ex rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315 Wis. 2d 350, 760
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140600 - 2015-04-23

[PDF] WI 73
that this court reviews de novo while benefitting from the analyses of the court of appeals and circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84400 - 2014-09-15

Donald E. Cavanaugh v. Robert Andrade
) creates a discretionary or ministerial duty is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16896 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jason Phillips
of appeals. ¶12 The first issue we address is whether we should review de novo, or grant deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17065 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 99
a Sullivan analysis in this case, our review is de novo. See id. ¶44 Lock’s other-acts argument is three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85770 - 2014-09-15

Sheri J. Storm v. Legion Insurance Company
that this court reviews de novo. Paul, 242 Wis. 2d 507, ¶10. III. ANALYSIS ¶15 Storm's medical malpractice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16500 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
review whether a harassment injunction complies with the First Amendment de novo. See id. III
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819728 - 2024-06-27

[PDF] Frontsheet
"reviews de novo while benefiting from the analyses of the court of appeals and circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253508 - 2020-02-04

State v. Michael S. Piddington
construction, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo." State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31

Elaine Marie Kohn v. Darlington Community Schools
property" under § 893.89 is a question of law that we review de novo. Kallas Millwork Corp. v. Square D Co
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18838 - 2005-06-30