Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 27131 - 27140 of 82944 for simple case search.

[PDF] Eugene Harris v. Judy Smith
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2193 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12808 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Slinker
in Sheboygan County. Subsequently, Slinker successfully appealed the Sheboygan County case; it was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
was not ineffective. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17

[PDF] Thomas G. v. Michael R.
acted negligently when he assaulted Tara. This case was previously on appeal to this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Weber
1997, Weber filed another motion alleging negligence in the investigation of his case resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14517 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
County, had not responded to his open records request pertaining to Milwaukee Co. Case no. 2006FA6891
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=553226 - 2022-08-09

CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107896 - 2014-02-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Tiggs is not entitled to credit in this case for time served on sentences from Racine and Grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81587 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192374 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ΒΆ2 While unusual, the history of this case is not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17